<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>proofonline.org &#187; Neuroscience</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.proofonline.org/blog/tag/neuroscience/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.proofonline.org/blog</link>
	<description>mental health blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Aug 2010 19:53:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Watch &#8216;FRONTLINE: The Medicated Child&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.proofonline.org/blog/2009/12/21/watch-frontline-the-medicated-child/</link>
		<comments>http://www.proofonline.org/blog/2009/12/21/watch-frontline-the-medicated-child/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 19:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Faneuil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anxiety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Autism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bipolar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuroscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OCD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prevention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prozac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sanity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shrinks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stigma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Suicide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Talk Therapy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proofonline.org/blog/?p=307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A frightening look at the institutional pressures shaping child psychopharmacology.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="Frontline" href="http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/medicatedchild/view/?utm_campaign=homepage&amp;utm_medium=proglist&amp;utm_source=proglist" target="_blank">This</a> is an astonishing video – not to be missed by anyone who cares about psychiatric diagnoses in children.</p>
<p>I pride myself in keeping an open mind about mental illness, but I have to admit that it&#8217;s tough to watch this video without feeling a pang of conservative rage. Where are we going with all of this? Are we so desperate and starry-eyed that we&#8217;re willing to experiment on our own children?? Don&#8217;t they deserve a more cautious approach?!??!?!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not quick to judge <em>any </em>of the parents. My heart goes out to them. I&#8217;ve never had a kid, let alone one with mental illness. But I do know something of the helplessness that surrounds families in the midst of these crises. It&#8217;s a God-awful experience – and a dangerous one, too. Feelings of abject helplessness lead to extreme vulnerability. And that&#8217;s exactly what you see in this video: vulnerable families being pressured into troubling treatment, all at the behest of powerful institutions with their own interests to weigh. I&#8217;m not skeptical of doctors or &#8220;experts&#8221; (that&#8217;s a strain of American fundamentalism I could live without), but at the same time we have to recognize our respective roles. A child&#8217;s care is the sole responsibility of his or her parents. The educational system and the health care industry, despite what they advertise, were not designed to care for any <em>particular</em> child. Those institutions have competing priorities (the profit initiative, organizational flow, etc.), including millions of other kids. What is good for a school or a doctor&#8217;s office might be at odds with what is good for a child. When it comes to medicating our youth, we should be especially vigilant about these conflicts of interest, and wise to how good people&#8217;s judgment can go bad.</p>
<p><a title="Frontline" href="http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/medicatedchild/view/?utm_campaign=homepage&amp;utm_medium=proglist&amp;utm_source=proglist" target="_blank">Watch Full Video</a></p>
<p><em>[Note the segment tiles above the video display; to watch the whole program, click on each segment.]</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.proofonline.org/blog/2009/12/21/watch-frontline-the-medicated-child/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fitting Dreams Into a Rational Box</title>
		<link>http://www.proofonline.org/blog/2009/11/19/fitting-dreams-into-a-rational-box/</link>
		<comments>http://www.proofonline.org/blog/2009/11/19/fitting-dreams-into-a-rational-box/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 19:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Faneuil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dreams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuroscience]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proofonline.org/blog/?p=256</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can a neurological purpose for dreams explain away their imagery?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.proofonline.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/Quote.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-138" title="Quote" src="http://www.proofonline.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/Quote.jpg" alt="Quote" width="80" height="63" /></a> Yet what if the primary purpose of dreaming isn’t psychological at all?</p>
<p>In a paper published last month in the journal Nature Reviews Neuroscience, Dr. J. Allan Hobson, a psychiatrist and longtime sleep researcher at Harvard, argues that the main function of rapid-eye-movement sleep, or REM, when most dreaming occurs, is physiological. The brain is warming its circuits, anticipating the sights and sounds and emotions of waking.&#8221;</p>
<p><a title="The New York Times" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/10/health/10mind.html?_r=1&amp;em" target="_blank">Read Full Article</a></p>
<p><em>[Surely dreaming has some sort of physiological purpose. But how does that undercut the power of interpretation? Dreams aren't designed with analysis in mind – that's precisely what makes them so interesting. In a sense, dreams are the purest form of free-association. When we're not awake to censor ourselves, our expressions run rampant. Dreams can be confusing, scary, mystifying and weird, but they cannot be someone else's. They may feel foreign – they often do – and it's always useful to consider why that's so. After all, one thing's for certain: we are their authors, intentionally or not. -Ed.]</em></p>
<p>(photo: detail from <a title="Wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Nightmare" target="_blank">The Nightmare</a> by <a title="Wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Fuseli" target="_blank">Henry Fuseli</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.proofonline.org/blog/2009/11/19/fitting-dreams-into-a-rational-box/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Habitual Exercise May Seed Anxiety-resistant Brain Cells</title>
		<link>http://www.proofonline.org/blog/2009/11/18/habitual-exercise-may-seed-anxiety-resistant-brain-cells/</link>
		<comments>http://www.proofonline.org/blog/2009/11/18/habitual-exercise-may-seed-anxiety-resistant-brain-cells/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 06:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Faneuil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anxiety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exercise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuroscience]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proofonline.org/blog/?p=253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new discovery helps to explain why working out makes us feel better. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.proofonline.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/Quote.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-138" title="Quote" src="http://www.proofonline.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/Quote.jpg" alt="Quote" width="80" height="63" /></a> It looks more and more like the positive stress of exercise prepares cells and structures and pathways within the brain so that they’re more equipped to handle stress in other forms,” says Michael Hopkins, a graduate student affiliated with the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory Laboratory at Dartmouth, who has been studying how exercise differently affects thinking and emotion. “It’s pretty amazing, really, that you can get this translation from the realm of purely physical stresses to the realm of psychological stressors.”</p>
<p><a title="The New York Times" href="http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/11/18/phys-ed-why-exercise-makes-you-less-anxious/" target="_blank">Read Full Article</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.proofonline.org/blog/2009/11/18/habitual-exercise-may-seed-anxiety-resistant-brain-cells/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Floss Your Brain</title>
		<link>http://www.proofonline.org/blog/2009/11/17/floss-your-brain/</link>
		<comments>http://www.proofonline.org/blog/2009/11/17/floss-your-brain/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:47:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Faneuil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuroscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proofonline.org/blog/?p=247</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The nonsurgical NeuroStar Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation system is as easy as a teeth cleaning. Seriously.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.proofonline.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/Quote.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-138" title="Quote" src="http://www.proofonline.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/Quote.jpg" alt="Quote" width="80" height="63" /></a> An electromagnetic headpiece could help the millions of depression sufferers for whom antidepressants fail. The nonsurgical NeuroStar Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation system is as easy as a teeth cleaning. The patient sits in a chair as an electromagnetic coil pulses magnetic fields to his or her left prefrontal cortex, the part of the brain that regulates mood. This stimulates neurons to make more mood-enhancing dopamine. After 30 40-minute daily sessions, half of the patients in a clinical trial experienced significantly reduced symptoms; a third reported complete resolution. Last fall, it became the first TMS therapy to earn FDA approval.</p>
<p><a title="Popular Science" href="http://www.popsci.com/bown/2009/product/neuronetics-neurostar-tms-therapy-system" target="_blank">Neuronetics NeuroStar TMS Therapy System</a></p>
<p><em>[I'd still use it. -Ed.]</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.proofonline.org/blog/2009/11/17/floss-your-brain/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Orchid&#8217; Theory Posits Illness as Side-effect of Darwinian Success</title>
		<link>http://www.proofonline.org/blog/2009/11/13/orchid-theory-posits-illness-as-side-effect-of-darwinian-success/</link>
		<comments>http://www.proofonline.org/blog/2009/11/13/orchid-theory-posits-illness-as-side-effect-of-darwinian-success/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 22:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Faneuil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anxiety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bullying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Genetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Happiness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuroscience]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proofonline.org/blog/?p=239</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are the emotionally disturbed our untapped heroes?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.proofonline.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/Quote.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-138" title="Quote" src="http://www.proofonline.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/Quote.jpg" alt="Quote" width="80" height="63" /></a> At first glance, this idea, which I’ll call the orchid hypothesis, may seem a simple amendment to the vulnerability hypothesis. It merely adds that environment and experience can steer a person up instead of down. Yet it’s actually a completely new way to think about genetics and human behavior. Risk [of illness] becomes possibility; vulnerability becomes plasticity and responsiveness. It’s one of those simple ideas with big, spreading implications. Gene variants generally considered misfortunes (poor Jim, he got the “bad” gene) can instead now be understood as highly leveraged evolutionary bets, with both high risks and high potential rewards&#8230;</p>
<p>[A] genetic trait tremendously maladaptive in one situation can prove highly adaptive in another. We needn’t look far to see this in human behavior. To survive and evolve, every society needs some individuals who are more aggressive, restless, stubborn, submissive, social, hyperactive, flexible, solitary, anxious, introspective, vigilant—and even more morose, irritable, or outright violent—than the norm. All of this helps answer that fundamental evolutionary question about how risk alleles have endured. We have survived not despite these alleles but because of them. And those alleles haven’t merely managed to slip through the selection process; they have been actively <em>selected for</em>.</p>
<p><a title="The Atlantic" href="http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200912/dobbs-orchid-gene" target="_blank">Read Full Article</a> (via <a title="The Frontal Cortex" href="http://scienceblogs.com/cortex/2009/11/orchid_genes.php" target="_blank">Jonah Lehrer</a>)</p>
<p><em>[Fascinating stuff – reminiscent of </em><a title="Living Proof Productions" href="http://www.proofonline.org/blog/2009/09/04/thank-god-for-depression/" target="_blank"><em>this post</em></a><em>. Also included, this wonderful zinger: "The orchid variant of the DRD4 gene, for instance, increases risk of ADHD (a syndrome best characterized, Cochran and Harpending write, 'by actions that annoy elementary-school teachers')." -Ed.]</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.proofonline.org/blog/2009/11/13/orchid-theory-posits-illness-as-side-effect-of-darwinian-success/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Antidepressants Restore Neurons, Not Chemicals</title>
		<link>http://www.proofonline.org/blog/2009/08/22/antidepressants-restore-neurons-not-chemicals/</link>
		<comments>http://www.proofonline.org/blog/2009/08/22/antidepressants-restore-neurons-not-chemicals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 21:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Faneuil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuroscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prozac]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proofonline.org/blog/?p=126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How Prozac sent the science of depression in the wrong direction.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.proofonline.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/Quote.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-138" title="Quote" src="http://www.proofonline.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/Quote.jpg" alt="Quote" width="80" height="63" /></a> This new scientific understanding of depression also offers a new way to think about the role of drugs in recovery. While antidepressants help brain cells recover their vigor and form new connections, Castren says that patients must still work to cement these connections in place, perhaps with therapy. He compares antidepressants with anabolic steroids, which increase muscle mass only when subjects also go to the gym.</p>
<p>&#8220;If you just sit on your couch, then steroids aren&#8217;t going to be very effective,&#8221; he says. &#8220;Antidepressants are the same way: if you want the drug to work for you, then you have to work for the drug.&#8221;</p>
<p><a title="The Boston Globe" href="http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/articles/2008/07/06/head_fake/" target="_blank">Read Full Article</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.proofonline.org/blog/2009/08/22/antidepressants-restore-neurons-not-chemicals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
