<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>proofonline.org &#187; Prozac</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.proofonline.org/blog/tag/prozac/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.proofonline.org/blog</link>
	<description>mental health blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Aug 2010 19:53:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Not News: The Efficacy of Drugs Is Overstated</title>
		<link>http://www.proofonline.org/blog/2010/01/06/not-news-the-efficacy-of-drugs-is-overstated/</link>
		<comments>http://www.proofonline.org/blog/2010/01/06/not-news-the-efficacy-of-drugs-is-overstated/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 23:31:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Faneuil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paxil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prozac]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proofonline.org/blog/?p=345</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new study alerts us to a very old story.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A <a title="New York Times" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/06/health/views/06depress.html?ref=health" target="_blank">headline</a> in today&#8217;s <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/" target="_blank">New York Times</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<h1 style="color: black; font-size: 18px; font-weight: normal; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 10px; margin-left: 0px; padding: 0px;">Popular Drugs May Help Only Severe Depression</h1>
</blockquote>
<p>A <a title="Nature" href="http://www.nature.com/nrneurol/journal/v4/n6/full/ncpneuro0803.html" target="_blank">headline</a> from two years ago in <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/" target="_blank">Nature</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<h1 style="font-size: 18px; color: black; font-weight: normal; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 10px; margin-left: 0px; padding: 0px;">SSRIs show efficacy over placebo only in the most severely depressed patients</h1>
</blockquote>
<p>Drug companies exaggerate and even fictionalize their drugs&#8217; benefits. This is not news.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not against the use of these drugs, but their reckless promotion leaves a sour taste. Who are these drugs made for, exactly? When I take one of these pills, who stands to gain? These are always good questions to ask. Pills can work, and in the severest cases they&#8217;re necessary despite risks. But in the battle for peace of mind, no drug is an easy answer. <a title="Wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam_Phillips_(psychologist)" target="_blank">Adam Phillips</a> says it best: &#8220;Havoc is always wreaked in fast cures for confusion.&#8221;</p>
<p><em>[Update: As usual, </em><a title="Wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonah_Lehrer" target="_blank"><em>Jonah Lehrer</em></a><em> has a </em><a title="The Frontal Cortex" href="http://scienceblogs.com/cortex/2008/02/prozac_and_placebos.php" target="_blank"><em>clever take</em></a><em> from a year ago. -Ed.]</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.proofonline.org/blog/2010/01/06/not-news-the-efficacy-of-drugs-is-overstated/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Watch &#8216;FRONTLINE: The Medicated Child&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.proofonline.org/blog/2009/12/21/watch-frontline-the-medicated-child/</link>
		<comments>http://www.proofonline.org/blog/2009/12/21/watch-frontline-the-medicated-child/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 19:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Faneuil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anxiety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Autism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bipolar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuroscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OCD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prevention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prozac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sanity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shrinks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stigma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Suicide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Talk Therapy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proofonline.org/blog/?p=307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A frightening look at the institutional pressures shaping child psychopharmacology.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="Frontline" href="http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/medicatedchild/view/?utm_campaign=homepage&amp;utm_medium=proglist&amp;utm_source=proglist" target="_blank">This</a> is an astonishing video – not to be missed by anyone who cares about psychiatric diagnoses in children.</p>
<p>I pride myself in keeping an open mind about mental illness, but I have to admit that it&#8217;s tough to watch this video without feeling a pang of conservative rage. Where are we going with all of this? Are we so desperate and starry-eyed that we&#8217;re willing to experiment on our own children?? Don&#8217;t they deserve a more cautious approach?!??!?!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not quick to judge <em>any </em>of the parents. My heart goes out to them. I&#8217;ve never had a kid, let alone one with mental illness. But I do know something of the helplessness that surrounds families in the midst of these crises. It&#8217;s a God-awful experience – and a dangerous one, too. Feelings of abject helplessness lead to extreme vulnerability. And that&#8217;s exactly what you see in this video: vulnerable families being pressured into troubling treatment, all at the behest of powerful institutions with their own interests to weigh. I&#8217;m not skeptical of doctors or &#8220;experts&#8221; (that&#8217;s a strain of American fundamentalism I could live without), but at the same time we have to recognize our respective roles. A child&#8217;s care is the sole responsibility of his or her parents. The educational system and the health care industry, despite what they advertise, were not designed to care for any <em>particular</em> child. Those institutions have competing priorities (the profit initiative, organizational flow, etc.), including millions of other kids. What is good for a school or a doctor&#8217;s office might be at odds with what is good for a child. When it comes to medicating our youth, we should be especially vigilant about these conflicts of interest, and wise to how good people&#8217;s judgment can go bad.</p>
<p><a title="Frontline" href="http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/medicatedchild/view/?utm_campaign=homepage&amp;utm_medium=proglist&amp;utm_source=proglist" target="_blank">Watch Full Video</a></p>
<p><em>[Note the segment tiles above the video display; to watch the whole program, click on each segment.]</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.proofonline.org/blog/2009/12/21/watch-frontline-the-medicated-child/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Antidepressants Restore Neurons, Not Chemicals</title>
		<link>http://www.proofonline.org/blog/2009/08/22/antidepressants-restore-neurons-not-chemicals/</link>
		<comments>http://www.proofonline.org/blog/2009/08/22/antidepressants-restore-neurons-not-chemicals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 21:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Faneuil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuroscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prozac]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proofonline.org/blog/?p=126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How Prozac sent the science of depression in the wrong direction.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.proofonline.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/Quote.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-138" title="Quote" src="http://www.proofonline.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/Quote.jpg" alt="Quote" width="80" height="63" /></a> This new scientific understanding of depression also offers a new way to think about the role of drugs in recovery. While antidepressants help brain cells recover their vigor and form new connections, Castren says that patients must still work to cement these connections in place, perhaps with therapy. He compares antidepressants with anabolic steroids, which increase muscle mass only when subjects also go to the gym.</p>
<p>&#8220;If you just sit on your couch, then steroids aren&#8217;t going to be very effective,&#8221; he says. &#8220;Antidepressants are the same way: if you want the drug to work for you, then you have to work for the drug.&#8221;</p>
<p><a title="The Boston Globe" href="http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/articles/2008/07/06/head_fake/" target="_blank">Read Full Article</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.proofonline.org/blog/2009/08/22/antidepressants-restore-neurons-not-chemicals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
